1789 Sheet – Supreme Court Georgia Appeals of Leo Frank, 1913, 1914

Search for:

Reading Time: 2 minutes [265 words]

Visible Translated Text Is As Follows:

the special demurrer, because said ground of demurrer present-
ed no good and sufficient reason in law for striking that
portion of the motion of plaintiff in error in said second
ground of the special demurrer pointed out, the said
portion of the motion, asmovant contends, being material
and relevant to the assertion. of the righte of movant as
set forth in paragraph 7 of his said motion.

And plaintiff in error specifies as all the record
material to a clear understanding of the errors complained
of, the following:

1. The motion of plaintiff in error, Leo M. Frank, to set
aside the verdict of guilty of murder rendered against him,
together with the order of the Court thereon of April 16, 1914,
the entry of filing thereon, and the acknowledgment of service
made on behalf of the State of Georgia by Hon. Hugh M. Dorsey,
its Solicitor General.

2. The amendment to said motion, allowed by the Court and
filed June 6, 1914.

3. The demurrer, both general and special, to the said
motion.

4. The judgment of the Court sustaining the demurrer and
dismissing the motion.

And now, within twenty days from the date of the rendition
of said judgment, and at the term of the Court at which the
same was rendered, comes Leo M. Frank, as plaintiff in error,
and presents this his bill of exceptions and prays that the same
may be signed and certified, that the errors alleged to have
been committed may be considered and corrected.

[Signed]
R. Parker
H. A. Matthews
L. Z. Rosser
[Illegible]
Attorneys at Law for Plaintiff in Error, residing at
Atlanta, Ga.

I do certify that the foregoing bill of exceptions is
true and specifies all of the record material to a clear